Underlying scholarly interest in diversity is the premise that a representative body contributes to robust decision-making processes. Using an innovative measure of opinion content, we examine this premise by analyzing deliberative outputs in the US courts of appeals (1997-2002). While the presence of a single female or minority did not affect the attention to issues in the majority opinion, panels composed of a majority of women or minorities produced opinions with significantly more points of law compared to panels with three Caucasian males.
Original Publication Information
Haire, Susan, Laura Moyer, and Shawn Treier. 2013. “Diversity, Deliberations, and Judicial Opinion Writing.” Journal of Law and Courts 1(2): 303-330.
Haire, Susan B.; Moyer, Laura P.; and Treier, Shawn, "Diversity, deliberations, and judicial opinion writing." (2013). Faculty Scholarship. Paper 81.
Available for download on Tuesday, January 31, 2017