Date on Master's Thesis/Doctoral Dissertation

12-2025

Document Type

Doctoral Dissertation

Degree Name

Ph. D.

Department

Criminal Justice

Degree Program

Criminal Justice, PhD

Committee Chair

Campbell, Bradley

Committee Member

Swartz, Kristin

Committee Member

Hughes, Thomas

Committee Member

Lapsey Jr., David

Author's Keywords

sexual assault kits (SAKs); police decision-making; focal concerns; police policies and practice; police discretion; case processing

Abstract

Sexual assault case attrition persists throughout the criminal justice system, partly due to inconsistent Sexual Assault Kit (SAK) submission decisions. This dissertation examines factors influencing police officers' decisions to submit SAKs for forensic testing, applying the focal concerns perspective to understand how legal and extra-legal characteristics shape these decisions. Using statewide Kentucky data from July 2007 to March 2018, this study analyzed 2,194 adult sexual assault cases from 192 law enforcement agencies. Of these cases, 1,520 (69.3%) resulted in SAK submission. Logistic regression analyses examined the full sample, as well as four subsamples. Results provide mixed support for focal concerns theory. Practical constraints, particularly agency type and resources, demonstrated the strongest influence. These findings highlight variation across agencies and support policy reforms including uniform statewide standards and enhanced funding for under-resourced agencies. This research contributes to understanding informal police decision-making in sexual assault cases.

Share

COinS